1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 202 A.D.2d
  5. 202 A.D.2d 188 (1994)
 

ACTION PICTURES, INC. v. FILMS AROUND THE WORLD, INC.

202 A.D.2d 188 (1994)

608 N.Y.S.2d 211

Action Pictures, Inc., Respondent, v. Films around the World, Inc., et al., Appellants. (Action No. 1.) Action Pictures, Inc., Respondent, v. Films around the World, Inc., et al., Appellants. (Action No. 2.) Films around the World, Inc., et al., Appellants, v. Action Pictures, Inc., et al., Respondents. (Action No. 3.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

March 3, 1994

The Michigan court had jurisdiction over defendants FAW and FDI. Review of the evidence demonstrates that, in light of, inter alia, the instant agency and distribution agreements which provided for the parties to transact business in Michigan, which they in fact did, Michigan had jurisdiction over defendants (see, Hanson v Denckla, 357 U.S. 235, 253); nor do we find any evidence that the default judgment was fraudulently...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases