TRIMEN DEVELOPMENT CO. v. KING COUNTY

No. 59452-0.

124 Wn.2d 261 (1994)

877 P.2d 187

TRIMEN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, Petitioner, v. KING COUNTY, Respondent.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

July 21, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cairncross & Hempelmann, P.S., by John W. Hempelmann, Janice Sue Wang, and Janet E. Garrow, for petitioner.

Norm Maleng, Prosecuting Attorney, and Charles Maduell, Senior Deputy, for respondent.


GUY, J.

Petitioner Trimen Development Company seeks review of a Court of Appeals decision affirming a summary judgment in favor of King County. Trimen seeks a refund of the park development fees it paid pursuant to King County Code (KCC) 19.38. Trimen claims that KCC 19.38, which conditions subdivision plat approval upon the dedication or reservation of land for open space or upon the payment of a fee in lieu of such dedication...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases