1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 69 Ohio
  5. 69 Ohio St.3d 315 (1994)
 

STATE EX REL. CATER v. CITY OF N. OLMSTED

No. 92-1073.

69 Ohio St.3d 315 (1994)

THE STATE EX REL. CATER, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, v. CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED ET AL., APPELLEES AND CROSS-APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 18, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Weiler & Weiler, Kevin P. Weiler and Cheri L. Westerburg, for appellant and cross-appellee.

Michael R. Gareau, Director of Law, and James M. Dubelko, for appellees and cross-appellants.

Per Curiam.

For a writ of mandamus to issue, Cater must establish that North Olmsted has a clear legal duty to act as he demands, that he has a clear legal right to this relief, and that he has no other adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. State ex rel. Berger v. McMonagle (1983), 6 Ohio St.3d 28, 29, 6 OBR 50, 51, 451 N.E.2d 225, 226.

Cater argues that (1) a list of aptitude test scores...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases