Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
The trial court properly set aside the verdict as against the evidence. No reasonable interpretation of the evidence supports any finding other than that the burn on plaintiff's calf, which subsequently required a skin graft, was sustained when the gooseneck lamp that was adjusted over defendant's shoulder came into contact with plaintiff's leg during the course of her gynecological treatment in defendant...
NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.
Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.
As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.
GET STARTED
OR
