The trial court properly set aside the verdict as against the evidence. No reasonable interpretation of the evidence supports any finding other than that the burn on plaintiff's calf, which subsequently required a skin graft, was sustained when the gooseneck lamp that was adjusted over defendant's shoulder came into contact with plaintiff's leg during the course of her gynecological treatment in defendant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.