1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 38 F.3d
  5. 38 F.3d 342 (1994)
 

FUTRELL v. J.I. CASE

No. 93-4049.

38 F.3d 342 (1994)

Roger FUTRELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J.I. CASE, a Tenneco Company, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided October 20, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas Nelson (argued), Schneidman, Myers, Dowling & Blumenfield, Milwaukee, WI, for plaintiff-appellant.

John T. Murray, Seyfarth, Shaw, Fair-weather & Geraldson, Chicago, IL, Alvin R. Ugent, Podell, Ugent & Cross, Milwaukee, WI, and William R. Sullivan, Jr. (argued) and Pamela B. Hall, Franczek, Sullivan, Mann, Crement, Hein & Relias, Chicago, IL, for defendant-appellee.

Gwendolyn Young Reams, James R. Neely, Jr., Robert J. Gregory, and Lorraine C. Davis, E.E.O.C., Office of Gen. Counsel, Washington, DC, for amicus curiae.

Before BAUER and FLAUM, Circuit Judges, and FOREMAN, District Judge.

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff Roger Futrell brought suit under Section 7 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 ("ADEA"), 29 U.S.C. § 626, against his former employer, Defendant J.I. Case, for discriminatory discharge from employment. At trial, a jury found for Futrell and awarded him $265,576 in damages. The district court then granted Case's motion for judgment as a matter of law (formerly judgment notwithstanding the verdict) under Fed.R.Civ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases