1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 275 N.J.
  5. 275 N.J. Super. 101 (1994)
 

MICHELE MATTHEWS, INC. v. KROLL & TRACT

275 N.J. Super. 101 (1994)

645 A.2d 798

MICHELE MATTHEWS, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. KROLL & TRACT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 26, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David A. Laughlin argued the cause for appellant (Kroll & Tract, appellants, pro se; Mr. Laughlin on the brief and reply letter brief).

Laurence H. Olive argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Olive on the brief).

Before Judges KING, ARNOLD M. STEIN and RODRIGUEZ.

The opinion of the court was delivered by ARNOLD M. STEIN, J.A.D.

At the conclusion of a bench trial, Judge Walls found that defendant law firm was liable to plaintiff employment agency for a placement fee. He entered judgment against defendant for $7,150, plus costs. We affirm.

During the end of April or the beginning of May 1989, Michele Francis, the proprietor of Michele Matthews, Inc., was contacted by George Wright, a partner in defendant firm. Wright...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases