1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.H.
  4. 138 N.H.
  5. 138 N.H. 238 (1994)
 

PUTNAM v. UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

No. 92-671.

138 N.H. 238 (1994)

DANIEL S. PUTNAM v. UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Supreme Court of New Hampshire.

February 4, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sakellarios & Associates, of Manchester (Jean-Claude Sakellarios on the brief and orally), for the plaintiff.

Devine, Millimet & Branch, P.A., of Manchester (Joseph M. McDonough, III and Ronald D. Ciotti on the brief, and Mr. Ciotti orally), for the defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BATCHELDER, J.

The plaintiff, Daniel S. Putnam, appeals the decision of the Superior Court (Gray, J.) dismissing his amended complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1986) because it did not allege that the defendant, the University of New Hampshire, acted with a discriminatory purpose or intent. We affirm.

The gravamen of the plaintiff's amended complaint is that the university's policy regarding eligibility for in-state...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases