DAYTON BAR ASSN. v. ROGERS

No. 94-1815.

71 Ohio St.3d 283 (1994)

DAYTON BAR ASSOCIATION v. ROGERS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 21, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Altick & Corwin and Dennis J. Adkins, for relator.

Flanagan, Lieberman, Hoffman & Swaim and Bradley C. Smith, for respondent.


Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we agree with the board's findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Richard H. Rogers is publicly reprimanded for having violated DR 1-102(A)(3) and (4). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., concur.

PFEIFER, J., dissents and would dismiss...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases