RUOTOLO v. I.R.S.

No. 1920, Docket 94-6075.

28 F.3d 6 (1994)

Michael & Kathleen M. RUOTOLO, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided June 24, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael and Kathleen M. Ruotolo, plaintiffs-appellants pro se.

Loretta C. Argrett, Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, DC (Gary R. Allen, Jonathan S. Cohen, Murray S. Horwitz, Attorneys Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Christopher F. Droney, U.S. Atty., of counsel) for appellee.

Before: MINER, OAKES, Circuit Judges, and CARTER, District Judge.


PER CURIAM:

Plaintiffs-appellants Michael and Kathleen M. Ruotolo (the "Ruotolos"), pro se, appeal from the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Daly, J.), entered December 16, 1993, granting defendant's motion for summary judgment. The Ruotolos also appeal from the district court's March 7, 1994 order denying their motion for reconsideration. We reverse, because the Ruotolos, pro se litigants, were not advised...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases