1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 203 A.D.2d
  5. 203 A.D.2d 128 (1994)
 

SANCHEZ v. MANHATTAN & BRONX SURFACE TRANSIT OPERATING AUTH.

203 A.D.2d 128 (1994)

610 N.Y.S.2d 507

Romeo Sanchez et al., Respondents, v. Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

April 19, 1994

In order to submit the issue of intoxication to the jury, it is not sufficient that there be merely some evidence that the plaintiff had been drinking, or that there was "`alcohol on breath'" (Arroyo v City of New York, 171 A.D.2d 541, 543). Here, plaintiff denied any alcohol consumption. While various witnesses noted alcohol on plaintiff's breath, this observation, standing alone, as noted, does not warrant the giving of an intoxication...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases