Defendant Gullatt's claim that the trial court improperly prevented him from showing that the complaining witness was fired from his job the day after the robbery because he was suspected by his employer as a perpetrator, and that he fabricated his identification in an attempt to regain his job and clear his name, is not preserved for appellate review as a matter of law, and we decline to review it in the interest of
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.