Since petitioner was aware of his "Category B" designation due to excessive absenteeism since March 26, 1990, which justified his having been passed over for promotion three times by February of 1991, prior to his filing a grievance in June of 1991, there is no merit to his claims of arbitrariness, bad faith or retaliatory action on the part of respondents. (See, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF ARDITO v. ABATE
203 A.D.2d 117 (1994)
612 N.Y.S.2d 845
In the Matter of Thomas P. Ardito, Appellant, v. Catherine Abate, as Correction Commissioner of The City of New York, et al., Respondents
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 14, 1994
April 14, 1994
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.