GOLDSTEIN v. CHRISTIANSEN

No. 94-396.

70 Ohio St.3d 232 (1994)

GOLDSTEIN ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. CHRISTIANSEN, JUDGE, ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided September 14, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Schnorf & Schnorf Co., L.P.A., and Barry F. Hudgin, for appellants.

Anthony G. Pizza, Lucas County Prosecuting Attorney, and Bertrand L. Puligandla, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Jones & Scheich, Christopher F. Jones, Richard A. Scheich and Martin B. Morrissey; Polese, Hiner & Nolan, Edwin A. Hiner, Patricia E. Nolan and Lynn M. Allen, for intervening appellees Denton Tussing et al.


Per Curiam.

Appellants assert in their first, third, fourth, and fifth propositions of law that the court of appeals erred in denying their request for a writ of prohibition where the common pleas court lacked personal jurisdiction over them. In order to obtain a writ of prohibition, relators must establish (1) that the court of officer against whom the writ is sought is about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial power, (2) that the exercise of that power...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases