SCOTT v. YATES

No. 93-1643.

71 Ohio St.3d 219 (1994)

SCOTT ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. YATES, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 20, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clark, Perdue, Roberts & Scott Co., L.P.A., and Dale K. Perdue, for appellants.

William J. Christensen, for appellee.


FRANCIS E. SWEENEY, SR., J.

In this case, we are asked to draw a clear distinction between accident investigation, which involves the collection and recording of information, and accident reconstruction, which involves use of scientific methodology to draw inferences from the investigative data. We decline the invitation to offer hard and fast rules pertaining to this issue. Instead, we confine our discussion to the particular facts at hand. In so doing, we simply...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases