1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 202 A.D.2d
  5. 202 A.D.2d 6 (1994)
 

MATTER OF NY COUNTY DES LITIG.

202 A.D.2d 6 (1994)

In the Matter of New York County DES Litigation Pamela Carrano et al., Respondents, v. Abbott Laboratories et al., Defendants, and Boyle & Co. Pharmaceuticals, Appellant Andrea Goldstein et al., Respondents, v. Abbott Laboratories et al., Defendants, and Boyle & Co. Pharmaceuticals, Appellant Alice Hooper et al., Respondents, v. Abbott Laboratories et al., Defendants, and Boyle & Co. Pharmaceuticals, Appellant Leslie LaCount et al., Respondents, v. Abbott Laboratories et al., Defendants, and Boyle & Co. Pharmaceuticals, Appellant Deborah Shaffer et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Abbott Laboratories et al., Defendants, and Boyle & Co. Pharmaceuticals, Appellant Ronnie Steinberg et al., Respondents, v. Abbott Laboratories et al., Defendants, and Boyle & Co. Pharmaceuticals, Appellant Iris Chernosky et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Abbott Laboratories et al., Defendants, and Boyle & Co. Pharmaceuticals, Appellant Albert Greene et al., Respondents, v. Abbott Laboratories et al., Defendants, and Boyle & Co. Pharmaceuticals, Appellant Susan A. Helmrich et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Abbott Laboratories et al., Defendants, and Boyle & Co. Pharmaceuticals, Appellant Sandra Kluge et al., Respondents, v. Eli Lilly & Company et al., Defendants, and Boyle & Co. Pharmaceuticals, Appellant Margaret Vilasi et al., Respondents, v. Eli Lilly & Company et al., Defendants, and Boyle & Co. Pharmaceuticals, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

August 18, 1994

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles M. McCaghey of counsel (Susan J. Krembs on the brief; Ryan, Ryan, Johnson, Clear & DeLuca, and Emmet J. Gantz, attorneys), for appellant.

Perry S. Reich of counsel (Law Offices of Sybil Shainwald, attorneys), for respondents.

ELLERIN, J. P., RUBIN, NARDELLI and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

ASCH, J.

This case involves the question of whether defendant-appellant Boyle & Co. Pharmaceuticals (Boyle) is subject to the personal jurisdiction of the New York courts. It is a given that plaintiffs' mothers ingested DES in New York and that plaintiffs were in utero in New York when the exposure to DES took place. It is also accepted that Boyle is a closely held California corporation which manufactured...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases