MATTER OF COPELAND v. DHCR


164 Misc.2d 42 (1994)

623 N.Y.S.2d 505

In the Matter of Tatiana Copeland, Petitioner, v. New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, New York County.

December 21, 1994


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rosenberg & Estis (Jeffrey Turkel of counsel), for petitioner. Dennis J. Saffran (Martin Schneider of counsel), for New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, defendant. Hartman, Ule, Rose & Ratner (Rose Ann Magaldi of counsel), for Lael Scott, defendant.


MARTIN SCHOENFELD, J.

In this interesting and well-briefed CPLR article 78 proceeding the sole legal issue presented, simply stated, is whether the "substantial rehabilitation" of a multiple dwelling terminates the "rent stabilization" protection of a tenant in continuous occupancy of an unimproved apartment. Petitioner landlord Tatiana Copeland now moves (1) to vacate a determination by respondent agency New...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases