1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 630 So.2d
  5. 630 So.2d 1199 (1994)
 

ARTHUR YOUNG & CO. v. MARINER CORP.

Nos. 91-1854, 92-0548, 92-0549 and 92-0857.

630 So.2d 1199 (1994)

ARTHUR YOUNG & COMPANY, n/k/a Ernst & Young, a foreign General Partnership, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. MARINER CORPORATION and Dielco Holding Corporation, Appellees/Cross-Appellants.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

January 19, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen N. Young, Kathryn A. Oberly and Thomas J. O'Connell, Ernst & Young, Washington, DC, Joel S. Perwin, Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow, Olin & Perwin, P.A., and Tom Pennekamp, Jr., Mershon, Sawyer, Johnston, Dunwody & Cole, Miami, for appellant, cross appellee.

F. Gregory Barnhart, Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., and Russell S. Bohn, Edna L. Caruso, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellees, cross-appellant.

WARNER, Judge.

Arthur Young & Company (AY) appeals a jury verdict against it finding it liable to appellee Mariner for violations of state and federal securities law, common law fraud, and negligence in connection with AY's representation of the sellers of Diversified Electronic Components, Inc. (Dielco) in a leveraged buyout of Dielco by Mariner. In a related appeal AY challenges a post-judgment award of attorney's fees in favor of Mariner. We consolidate these...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases