STATE EX REL. JOHNSON v. TALIKKA

No. 94-1021.

71 Ohio St.3d 109 (1994)

THE STATE EX REL. JOHNSON, SHERIFF, APPELLANT, v. TALIKKA, SPECIAL PROS. ATTY., APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 7, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas L. Sartini, for appellant.

Talikka, Ischie, Talikka & Wilson and Leo J. Talikka, Special Prosecutor, pro se.


Per Curiam.

Sheriff Johnson asserts in his first proposition of law that quo warranto is the only remedy available in law or equity to challenge the appointment of either a special prosecutor or an assistant prosecutor. The court of appeals denied quo warranto relief on the basis that Sheriff Johnson "has a remedy at law by way of a motion to dismiss, which if overruled by the trial court, may be appealed at the conclusion of the proceedings against him." Extraordinary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases