1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 860 F.Supp.
  5. 860 F.Supp. 890 (1994)
 

U.S. v. BOUCHEY

Civ. A. No. 94-952 SSH.

860 F.Supp. 890 (1994)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Amparo B. BOUCHEY, John E. Ricche, and Wendell Harbour, Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

August 23, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert L. Shapiro, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, DC, for plaintiff.

Amparo B. Bouchey, pro se.

Henry Schoenfeld, Washington, DC, for Ricche.

Charles B. Molster, III, Keck, Mahin & Cate, Washington, DC, for Harbour.

MEMORANDUM ORDER

STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.

Before the Court are defendant Wendell Harbour's motions to dismiss the complaint and amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.1 The Court denies defendant's motions. Although "[f]indings of fact and conclusions of law are unnecessary on decisions of motions under Rule 12," the Court nonetheless sets forth its analysis. See

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases