1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 853 F.Supp.
  5. 853 F.Supp. 808 (1994)
 

AMP, INC. v. FUJITSU MICROELECTRONICS, INC.

Civ. A. No. 1:CV-93-361.

853 F.Supp. 808 (1994)

AMP, INCORPORATED, The Whitaker Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. FUJITSU MICROELECTRONICS, INC., Fujitsu Limited, Defendants.

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania.

April 25, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David E. Lehman, Harrisburg, PA, Jack C. Goldstein, Thomas A. Miller, J. Mike Amerson, Arnold, White & Durkee, Russell T. Wong, Arnold, White & Durkee, Houston, TX, for AMP, Inc., The Whitaker Corp.

William W. Warren, Jr., Saul, Ewing, Remick & Saul, Harrisburg, PA, Brian G. Brunsvold, Albert J. Santorelli, Don O. Burley, David L. Soltz, Donald C. Kordich, Roger D. Taylor, Finnegan Henderson Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, Washington, DC, for Fujitsu Microelectronics, Inc., Fujitsu Ltd.

MEMORANDUM

CALDWELL, District Judge.

We are considering Defendants' five motions, four for partial summary judgment, and one to determine that certain documents are not privileged, and Plaintiffs' three motions, one for partial summary judgment, one to compel, and one for a protective order. We exercise jurisdiction according to 28 U.S.C. § 1338.

I. Facts

This case revolves around U.S. Patent No. 4,762,500 (the "'500...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases