DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CA. v. BANASKY

Docket No. B067408.

27 Cal.App.4th 1598 (1994)

33 Cal. Rptr.2d 381

DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CHARLES BANASKY et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

September 1, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Stradling, Yocca, Carlson & Rauth and Randall J. Sherman for Defendants and Appellants.

Cutler & Cutler, Salerno & Dassoff, Paul R. Salerno, Nancy L. Dassoff, Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe and Matthew L. Larrabee for Plaintiff and Respondent.


OPINION

KLEIN, P.J.

Defendants and appellants Charles Banasky (Banasky) and David G. Van Horn (Van Horn) (collectively, the dentists) appeal a judgment following a grant of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff and respondent Delta Dental Plan of California (Delta).

The essential question presented is whether Delta's determination as to what constitutes the usual, customary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases