1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 30 F.3d
  5. 30 F.3d 1459 (1994)
 

IN RE FREEMAN

No. 93-1449.

30 F.3d 1459 (1994)

In re Jerre M. FREEMAN.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 12, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bradford E. Kile, Baker & McKenzie, Washington, DC, argued, for appellant. With him on the brief were Ruffin B. Cordell and Stuart M. Weitz.

Murriel E. Crawford, Associate Sol., Com'r of Patents and Trademarks, Arlington, VA, argued, for appellee. With her on the brief were Fred E. McKelvey, Sol. and Lee E. Barrett, Associate Sol.

Before RICH, PLAGER, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges.

RICH, Circuit Judge.

Dr. Jerre M. Freeman appeals from the March 22, 1993 decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (Board) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) sustaining the Examiner's rejection of claims 10-21 of Reexamination No. 90/001,235 (the '235 application)1 under 35 U.S.C. § 305 as impermissibly broadening the scope of the claims in a reexamination proceeding.2

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases