SHOSHONE-BANNOCK TRIBES v. FISH & GAME COM'N, IDAHO

No. 94-35280.

42 F.3d 1278 (1994)

SHOSHONE-BANNOCK TRIBES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FISH & GAME COMMISSION, IDAHO, sued as: Idaho Fish & Game Commission; Jerry Conley, individually and in his official capacity as Director of Idaho Fish and Game; Richard Meiers; Norm Guth; Louis Racine; Wesley Rose, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided December 16, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Candy L. Jackson and Jeanette Wolfley, Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, Fort Hall, ID, for plaintiff-appellant.

Clive J. Strong, Deputy Atty. Gen., and Steven W. Strack, Deputy Atty. Gen., Boise, ID, for defendants-appellees.

Before: BEEZER anFERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges, and ORRICK, District Judge.


BEEZER, Circuit Judge:

The Shoshone-Bannock Tribes (Tribes) challenge an order of the Idaho Fish and Game Commission (Fish and Game) prohibiting all fishing for Spring Chinook Salmon during the summer of 1991 in an area of the Salmon River traditionally fished by the Tribes. The district court dismissed the action as moot and as barred by the Eleventh Amendment. We have jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse and remand in part and affirm in part.

...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases