1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 26 F.3d
  5. 26 F.3d 100 (1994)
 

ANDERSON v. NIDORF

No. 93-55131.

26 F.3d 100 (1994)

Cletus Robert ANDERSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Barry J. NIDORF, Chief Probation Officer; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided June 7, 1994.

As Amended July 6, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John E. Douglass and Michele S. Douglass, Long Beach, CA, for petitioner-appellant.

Sanjay T. Kumar, Los Angeles, CA, for respondents-appellees.

Before: TANG, CANBY, and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OVERVIEW

Cletus Robert Anderson appeals the district court's denial of his habeas corpus petition challenging his conviction under California Penal Code § 653w for failure to disclose the origin of a sound recording. Anderson claims that this California statute is preempted by federal copyright laws and violates the First Amendment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.

BACKGROUND

At a flea market...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases