Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
The trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion when it precluded the defendant from presenting alibi witnesses upon the trial of Indictment No. 11555/89 on the ground that the defendant did not provide adequate notice under CPL 250.20, since the defendant did not proffer a sufficient reason for his failure to comply (see, People v Toro,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.