1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 39 F.3d
  5. 39 F.3d 1056 (1994)
 

BERRY v. BUNNELL

No. 93-16797.

39 F.3d 1056 (1994)

Waymon M. BERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William J. BUNNELL, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided November 9, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Waymon M. Berry, in pro per.

G. Lewis Chartrand, Jr.; James Ching, Deputies Atty. Gen., Sacramento, CA, for defendants-appellees.

Before: WRIGHT, BEEZER and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Berry appeals pro se the district court's grant of the prison officials' motion for a directed verdict in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.

We review de novo a grant of a directed verdict. Zamalloa v. Hart, 31 F.3d 911, 913 (9th Cir.1994). A directed verdict is proper when the evidence permits only one reasonable conclusion. Id. The evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases