FRIENDS OF FOREST PARK v. LCDC

93-RA-876; CA A80305.

877 P.2d 130 (1994)

129 Or. App. 28

FRIENDS OF FOREST PARK, Petitioner, v. LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION and Oregon Concrete & Aggregate Producers Association, Inc., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 6, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Neil S. Kagan, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

John T. Bagg, Asst. Atty. Gen., argued the cause for respondent Land Conservation and Development Com'n. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen.

Paul R. Hribernick, Portland, argued the cause for respondent Oregon Concrete & Aggregate Producers Ass'n., Inc. With him on the brief was Black Helterline.

Before DEITS, P.J., and RIGGS and HASELTON, JJ.


DEITS, Presiding Justice.

Petitioner seeks review of the portion of LCDC's periodic review order that requires Multnomah County to repeat the Goal 5 process ab initio for a mineral and aggregate resource site as to which the county fully allowed conflicting uses over mineral and aggregate resources.1 OAR 660-16-010(2). Petitioner argues that LCDC's order conflicts with Goal 5 and the goal's implementing rule, OAR 660-16-000 et...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases