CRAWFORD v. FAYEZ

No. 9218SC573.

435 S.E.2d 545 (1993)

112 N.C. App. 328

Kent D. CRAWFORD and wife, Lynn B. Crawford, Plaintiffs, v. Jamil A. FAYEZ, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

October 19, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Grover C. McCain, Jr. by Grover C. McCain, Jr., and Phyllis Moore, Chapel Hill, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Bell, Davis & Pitt, P.A. by Joseph T. Carruthers and Charlot F. Wood, Winston-Salem, for defendant-appellee.


MARTIN, Judge.

Plaintiffs assign error to the admission of testimony by defendant's former patients and to the court's instructions to the jury. We find no error in the trial below.

At trial, five of defendant's former patients were permitted to testify, over plaintiffs' objection, that defendant had informed them of Medrol's possible side effects, including bone damage. The trial court admitted this testimony for the "limited purposes of showing routine practice...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases