Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
A local Chevrolet dealer purchased a van from the petitioner and then had the van customized by an independent custom shop. The respondent Lee purchased the customized van from the Chevrolet dealer. The van had a leak at the upper corner of the windshield, allegedly caused by the van's roof conversion. When the problem could not be corrected by the dealer, the respondent sought "Lemon Law" (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.