OLLHOFF v. PECK

No. 92-2900.

177 Wis.2d 719 (1993)

503 N.W.2d 323

David OLLHOFF and Kathy Ollhoff, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Jim PECK d/b/a/ Jim Peck's Wildwood, Peck's Wildwood, Inc., and Essex Insurance Company, Defendants-Respondents, EMPLOYERS INSURANCE OF WAUSAU, a Mutual Company, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided June 15, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the plaintiffs-appellants, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Randy L. Frokjer of Ament, Wulf & Frokjer of Merrill.

On behalf of the defendants-respondents, the cause was submitted on the brief of Matthew E. Yde of Ruder, Ware & Michler, S.C. of Wausau.

Before Cane, P.J., LaRocque and Myse, JJ.


CANE, P.J.

David and Kathy Ollhoff appeal a judgment and orders denying them summary judgment, refusing to allow evidence of remedial measures and refusing to set aside the jury verdict. They argue that (1) strict liability should have applied against the defendants because they housed "wild" animals, (2) the trial court erred by refusing to allow the Ollhoffs to present evidence of remedial measures and (3) the trial court should have set aside the verdict as perverse...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases