1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 874 S.W.2d
  5. 874 S.W.2d 15 (1993)
 

ARCATA GRAPHICS v. HEIDELBERG HARRIS

874 S.W.2d 15 (1993)

ARCATA GRAPHICS COMPANY and Arcata Graphics/Hawkins, a division of Arcata Graphics Kingsport, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. HEIDELBERG HARRIS, INC., Defendant-Appellant. HEIDELBERG HARRIS, INC. and Heidelberg Harris, S.A., Counter-plaintiffs-Appellees, v. ARCATA GRAPHICS COMPANY and Arcata Graphics Kingsport, Inc., Counter-defendants-Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Eastern Section, at Knoxville.

Permission to Appeal Denied March 7, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stuart M. Brown, Lillick & Charles, San Francisco, CA and Michael A. Faulk, Church Hill, for plaintiffs/appellees and counter-defendants/appellants.

Charles H. Warfield, H. Naill Falls, Jr. and Garry K. Grooms, Farris, Warfield & Kanaday, Nashville, for defendant/appellant and counter-plaintiffs/appellees.

Permission to Appeal Denied by Supreme Court March 7, 1994.

OPINION

LEWIS, Judge.

The original defendant, Heidelberg Harris, Inc. (Harris), appeals from the judgment entered on the jury verdict which awarded plaintiff, Arcata Graphics/Hawkins (Hawkins) $1,000,000.00. In addition, the original plaintiffs, Arcata Graphics Company (AGC) and Arcata Graphics/Hawkins, a division of Arcata Graphics Kingsport, Inc. (Kingsport), in their capacity as...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases