ARMSTRONG v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT

Civ. A. No. 89-142 (CRR).

830 F.Supp. 19 (1993)

Scott ARMSTRONG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF the PRESIDENT, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

September 3, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael E. Tankersley, Public Citizen Litigation Group, with David C. Vladeck, Public Citizen Litigation Group, Washington, DC, were on the briefs, for plaintiffs.

David J. Anderson, Atty., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civ. Div., Washington, DC, with whom Stuart E. Schiffer, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., J. Ramsey Johnson, U.S. Atty., D.D.C. and Elizabeth A. Pugh, Jason R. Baron, Anthony J. Coppolino, Peter D. Coffman, and Pamela A. Moreau, Attys., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civ. Div., were on the briefs, for defendants.


OPINION

CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.

Before the Court is the Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel the production of a Vaughn index for materials located with the Defendant Archivist pursuant to a Protective Order entered in United States v. Weinberger. Caspar Weinberger has filed a Motion to Intervene for the purpose of opposing the Plaintiffs' Motion, which the Court shall grant as unopposed.1

After...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases