Given that the relief defendant seeks was the very relief it had sought and was denied in the IAS Court's prior order entered July 18, 1991, and also that the IAS Court, while expressly stating that it was "adher[ing]" to such prior order, neither indicated that it was granting reargument nor addressed the merits of defendant's argument, we think it clear that the IAS Court deemed the motion to be one for reargument of the prior order, and denied reargument. Accordingly,...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
