Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant was indicted under an accomplice theory for felony murder for the robbery and shooting death of a livery cab driver. The defendant contends that he is entitled to reversal because the circumstantial evidence was legally insufficient to warrant conviction. We disagree.
Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.