Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the trial court committed reversible error when it allowed the prosecutor to introduce evidence, on its direct case, that in 1989 the defendant pleaded guilty to selling cocaine. The defendant further argues that, despite the trial court's limiting instruction, this evidence improperly labeled the defendant as a repeat cocaine seller.
It is well established that evidence of uncharged crimes...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.