CARDINAL CHEMICAL CO. v. MORTON INT'L, INC.

No. 92-114.

508 U.S. 83 (1993)

CARDINAL CHEMICAL CO. et al. v. MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC.

United States Supreme Court.

Decided May 17, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles F. Schill argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Larry L. Shatzer II.

Gordon R. Coons argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were John E. Rosenquist, Jeffrey S. Ward, and Gerald K. White.*

Stevens, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court with respect to Parts I, II, and III, and the opinion of the Court with respect to Part IV, in which Rehnquist, C. J., and White, Blackmun, O'Connor, Kennedy, and Thomas, JJ., joined. Scalia, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, in which Souter, J., joined, p. 103.


Justice Stevens, delivered the opinion of the Court.

The question presented is whether the affirmance by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit of a finding that a patent has not been infringed is a sufficient reason for vacating a declaratory judgment holding the patent invalid.

Respondent, Morton International, Inc. (Morton), is the owner of two patents on chemical compounds used in polyvinyl chloride (PVC).1 In 1983 Morton...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases