COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC. v. MILLER HYDRO GROUP

Nos. 93-1266, 93-1267.

13 F.3d 437 (1993)

COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., Plaintiff, Appellant, v. MILLER HYDRO GROUP, et al., Defendants, Appellees. COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., Plaintiff, Appellee, v. MILLER HYDRO GROUP, et al., Defendants, Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Decided December 30, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John H. Montgomery with whom Gordon F. Grimes, David A. Soley, Diane S. Lukac, Faith K. Bruins and Bernstein, Shur, Sawyer & Nelson, Portland, ME, were on briefs for plaintiff.

George S. Isaacson with whom David W. Bertoni and Brann & Isaacson, Lewiston, ME, were on briefs for defendant Miller Hydro Group.

Roy S. McCandless with whom Robert S. Frank, Mark K. Googins and Verrill & Dana, Portland, ME, were on brief for party-in-interest appellee Kansallis-Osake-Pankki.

Before BOUDIN and STAHL, Circuit Judges, and FUSTE, District Judge.


BOUDIN, Circuit Judge.

This appeal arises out of a complex commercial dispute, with overtones of deception, relating to the construction of a hydroelectric facility in Maine. In the ensuing litigation, neither the builder, Combustion Engineering, Inc., nor the owner, Miller Hydro Group, succeeded in recovering against the other. Both appeal. We affirm the district court.

I. BACKGROUND

In the early 1980's, Miller Hydro set about creating a hydroelectric...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases