IN RE APPLICATION OF GROSSMAN

No. 93-362.

66 Ohio St.3d 372 (1993)

IN RE APPLICATION OF GROSSMAN.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 16, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael D. Juhola, for applicant.

Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, Charles A. Schneider and Susan M. Barrett, for the Columbus Bar Association.


Per Curiam.

We concur in the board's findings and adopt its recommendation. The applicant has failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that he possesses the requisite character, fitness, and moral qualifications for admission to the practice of law. Neal L. Grossman's application to register as a candidate for admission to the practice of law is denied, and he is permanently prohibited from reapplying to take the Ohio bar examination and from reapplying...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases