OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. JACKSON

No. 93-215.

66 Ohio St.3d 338 (1993)

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. JACKSON.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 9, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Warren Bettis, Disciplinary Counsel, and Harald F. Craig III, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.

Jonathan M. Jackson, pro se.


Per Curiam.

Respondent has failed to show why he should not receive discipline comparable to that imposed by the Supreme Court of Hawaii. The findings approved by the Supreme Court of Hawaii clearly demonstrate respondent's personal responsibility for extended neglect of his clients as well as his other disciplinary violations. Accordingly, we hereby suspend respondent from the practice of law in Ohio for the duration of his Hawaii suspension. However, before...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases