In this proceeding the respondent is charged with 10 allegations of professional misconduct. Charge One alleges that the respondent neglected an appeal assigned to him by the Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department. On or about November 14, 1989, the respondent was assigned to an appeal but thereafter took no material steps to perfect the appeal. On or about June 5, 1991, the respondent was relieved as...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.