We agree with the IAS Court that appellant's failure to post the bond first directed in the order of September 10, 1991 until April 10, 1992 is an unexcused default warranting judgment against him. Even if that order was not "clear and unambiguous", appellant failed again to post the bond within the extended time he was given in the order dated February 28, 1992. Although the latter order was not entered until March 16, 1992, there is no showing that the mailing practices...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
