1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 176 Ariz.
  5. 176 Ariz. 125 (1993)
 

MATOS v. CITY OF PHOENIX

No. 2 CA-CV 92-0183.

176 Ariz. 125 (1993)

859 P.2d 748

Michael MATOS and Maria Matos, husband and wife; Ronald Daye and Catherine Daye, husband and wife, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. CITY OF PHOENIX, Defendant/Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department B.

Review Denied October 5, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Office of Stanley Lubin by Stanley Lubin and Lisa K. Hudson, Phoenix, for plaintiffs/appellants Matos.

Michael Napier, Phoenix, for plaintiffs/appellants Daye.

Lewis and Roca by Susan M. Freeman and Richard S. Cohen, Phoenix, for defendant/appellee.

OPINION

DRUKE, Presiding Judge.

This appeal challenges an adverse summary judgment on appellants' claims against the City of Phoenix for handicap and age discrimination in violation of the Arizona Civil Rights Act. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-2101(B).

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Appellants Matos and Daye each served as police officers for the city for more than 20 years. During the course of their respective...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases