No. 91-70731.

990 F.2d 1531 (1993)

CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, Central Arizona Irrigation and Drainage District, Maricopa-Stanfield Irrigation & Drainage District, New Magma Irrigation & Drainage District, and Harquahala Valley Irrigation District, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent, Salt River Project and Power District, Grand Canyon Trust, and the Wilderness Society, Respondents-Intervenors.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided March 25, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marvin S. Cohen, Sacks, Tierney & Kasen, Leslie A. McCarthy (on brief), Phoenix, AZ, for petitioners.

Scott A. Schachter, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Vicki L. Patton, U.S. E.P.A., Washington, DC, for respondent.

Patrick M. Raher, Hogan & Hartson, Washington, DC, for respondents-intervenors.

Beryl I. Dulsky, Asst. Atty. Gen., Phoenix, AZ, for amicus curiae.

Before: ALDISERT, GOODWIN, and FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:

Petitioners Central Arizona Water Conservation District ("CAWCD") and four irrigation districts1 (collectively "Petitioners" or the "Districts") challenge an Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") Final Rule which requires a 90% reduction in sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions at the Navajo Generating Station ("NGS") in order to improve winter average visibility in the Grand Canyon National Park...

Let's get started


Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases