The Family Court erred since its disposition was not made in accordance with the best interests of the child pursuant to Social Services Law § 392 (6). The court's remarks indicate that it focused almost exclusively upon fashioning the best solution for the mother, rather than the child. Furthermore, at the time of the hearing, a discharge of the child to the mother presented a grave risk of danger to the child since the record was replete with evidence that the mother...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
