STATE v. RUESGA

No. 920426-CA.

851 P.2d 1229 (1993)

STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Fernando RUESGA, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Utah.

April 22, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger K. Scowcroft and Elizabeth Holbrook, Salt Lake City, for defendant and appellant.

Jan Graham and Christine F. Soltis, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and appellee.

Before GARFF, GREENWOOD and ORME, JJ.


OPINION

ORME, Judge:

Defendant appeals the revocation of his probation based on his unwillingness to sign a probation agreement. He argues that signing the agreement was not a condition of probation, that his failure to sign was not willful, and that he lacked the ability to understand the proceedings against him. He also contends that the trial court's findings supporting its decision are in error. We affirm.

FACTS

On February 18, 1992...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases