DANO RESOURCE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

No. 91-AA-55.

620 A.2d 1346 (1993)

DANO RESOURCE RECOVERY, INC., Petitioner, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Respondent.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided February 23, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gilbert J. Ginsburg, Washington, DC, with whom Philip C. Jones, Falls Church, VA, and Peter Paul Mitrano, Fairfax, VA, were on the brief, for petitioner.

Edward E. Schwab, Asst. Corp. Counsel, with whom John Payton, Corp. Counsel, Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, and Lutz Alexander Prager, Asst. Deputy Corp. Counsel, Washington, DC, were on the brief, for respondent.

Before FERREN, STEADMAN and FARRELL, Associate Judges.


FARRELL, Associate Judge:

This is a petition for review of a decision by the District of Columbia Contract Appeals Board (the Board) arising from the District government's termination of a $78,084,193 contract with Dano Resource Recovery, Inc. (Dano) for the processing and disposal of sludge and solid waste. Dano appealed the termination to the Board and sought an award of damages. When the District claimed removal and reprocurement costs from Dano, Dano filed a second...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases