WESTINGHOUSE ELEC. CORP. v. NEWMAN & HOLTZINGER, P.C.

No. 91-56533.

992 F.2d 932 (1993)

WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEWMAN & HOLTZINGER, P.C.; Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge; Chase, Rotchford, Drukker & Bogust, Law Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided May 4, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Moses Lasky and Charles B. Cohler, Lasky, Haas, Cohler & Munter, San Francisco, CA, for Westinghouse Elec. Corp., plaintiff-appellant.

Peter J. Kahn, Williams & Connolly, Washington, DC, for Newman & Holtzinger, P.C., defendant-appellee.

Ronald C. Redcay, Arnold & Porter, Los Angeles, CA, for Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge, defendant-appellee.

Nowland C. Hong, Parker, Milliken, Clark, O'Hara & Samuelian, Los Angeles, CA, for Chase, Rotchford, Drukker & Bogust, Law Corp., defendant-appellee.

Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, and O'SCANNLAIN and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.


FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge:

Westinghouse Electric Corporation (Westinghouse) appeals the district court's dismissal of its action for breach of and tortious interference with an alleged agreement entered into during an underlying federal action. Westinghouse originally brought its action in California state court against three law firms, two of which — Newman & Holtzinger, P.C. (N & H) and Chase, Rotchford, Drukker & Bogust (Chase) — represented...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases