U.S. v. DALE

Nos. 91-3228 to 91-3232.

991 F.2d 819 (1993)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. David M. DALE, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Michelle ASHTON, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Martin SEGAL, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. AUTOMATED DATA MANAGEMENT, INC., Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Terence SWEENEY, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided April 6, 1993.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied June 16, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel J. Buffone, Washington, DC, for appellant David M. Dale in No. 91-3228.

Paul Mogin, with whom Brendan V. Sullivan, Jr., Washington, DC, was on the brief, for appellant Michelle L. Ashton in No. 91-3229.

Alan M. Dershowitz, Cambridge, MA, with whom R. Stan Mortenson and Scott L. Nelson, Washington, DC, were on the brief, for appellant Martin Segal in No. 91-3230.

W. Neil Eggleston, with whom Laura S. Shores, Washington, DC, was on the brief, for appellant Terence A. Sweeney in No. 91-3232.

Kenneth Michael Robinson, Washington, DC, was on the brief for appellant Automated Data Management, Inc. in No. 91-3231. Robert F. Muse, Boston, MA, also entered an appearance for appellant Automated Data Management, Inc.

Stephen P. Anthony, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Jay B. Stephens, U.S. Atty., and John R. Fisher, Robert J. Meyer and Helene Kazanjian, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, DC, were on the brief, for appellee.

Before WALD, RUTH BADER GINSBURG and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.


Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied June 16, 1993.

Opinion PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM:

The defendants, a corporation and its officers, challenge their convictions and sentences on various counts of fraud against the United States and its agencies. For the reasons set out below, we affirm their convictions in toto but remand for resentencing pursuant to Part X(F) of this opinion.

I. FACTS

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases