BURBANK v. SEE DESIGN & PRODUCTION

90-14100 and 89-25312; CA A75891.

858 P.2d 922 (1993)

123 Or. App. 113

In the Matter of the Compensation of Eldon Burbank, Claimant. Eldon BURBANK, Petitioner, v. SEE DESIGN & PRODUCTION, North Pacific Insurance Company, North Metro RV Center and SAIF Corporation, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 8, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Glen H. Downs, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Gerald C. Doblie and Doblie & Associates, Portland.

Steve Cotton, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondents North Metro RV Center and SAIF Corp. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

No appearance for respondents See Design & Production and North Pacific Ins. Co.

Before DEITS, P.J., and DE MUNIZ and LEESON, JJ.


DE MUNIZ, Judge.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board holding that SAIF, as processing agent for the noncomplying employer, is not responsible for claimant's back condition. The Board's decision is supported by substantial evidence, and we therefore affirm it.

In 1983, claimant compensably injured his low back while working for See Design & Production, Inc. (See), and doctors diagnosed a disc condition at L5-6. See was insured...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases