HOLDNER v. COLUMBIA COUNTY

89-21-75; CA A74899.

858 P.2d 901 (1993)

123 Or. App. 48

William F. HOLDNER, Appellant, v. COLUMBIA COUNTY, a political subdivision, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 1, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael J. Morris, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Bennett & Hartman, Portland.

Thomas W. Sondag, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Michael J. Lilly and Lane, Powell, Spears, Lubersky, Portland.

Before WARREN, P.J., and EDMONDS and LANDAU, JJ.


EDMONDS, Judge.

Plaintiff brought this action for breach of contract and inverse condemnation. The trial court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment on the breach of contract claim. ORCP 47. At trial, it held for defendant on the inverse condemnation claim. We affirm.

Plaintiff's first assignment of error is directed at the trial court's ruling regarding the inverse condemnation claim. Plaintiff owns land adjacent to Dutch Canyon Road. In 1986, a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases